logicsrc/docs/opencontext/permissions.md
Anthony Ettinger 3ab8a4b38b
Add the LogicSRC OpenContext specification (#132)
* Add the LogicSRC OpenContext specification

OpenContext is an open specification for durable, portable, permissioned,
provenance-aware context shared between humans and AI agents. It defines how
organizational knowledge is described, authorized, versioned, resolved,
audited, and handed between replaceable workers without losing institutional
state.

Follows the OpenPRD/OpenOntology pattern already in the repo: self-contained
JSON Schemas in @logicsrc/schemas, a reference implementation package, CLI
subcommands, docs, examples, and an OpenPRD record.

Schemas (8, all self-contained so a third party can fetch one file and
validate against it with no further resolution):
  manifest, object, bundle, role, provenance, decision, diagnostic,
  audit-event — registered in @logicsrc/validators and schemas:validate.

Reference implementation (@logicsrc/opencontext):
  loader with upward manifest discovery, the full resolution pipeline,
  authority/supersession, permissions, redaction, lifecycle, provenance,
  deterministic digests, doctor, search, graph, history/diff, guarded writes,
  audit events, and file/http/git/sqlite adapters.

CLI: all 15 specified commands, as a standalone `opencontext` binary and as
`logicsrc context`, sharing one implementation so the two cannot drift.

Design decisions worth noting:

- Supersession is declared, never inferred from version numbers. Inferring it
  would hide the governance failure it represents and make
  multiple-active-versions and duplicate-canonical impossible to detect.

- The bundle digest identifies the resolved context, not the moment it was
  computed, so generated_at/bundle_id/digest/as_of are excluded while objects,
  lifecycle states, exclusions and warnings are covered. That is what lets a
  decision record cite exactly the context that produced it.

- A role's own max_classification beats an inherited one, so a ceiling on a
  shared base role cannot silently cap a role deliberately granted more;
  requesting several roles at once still takes the lowest, so combining roles
  never escalates.

- Scope wildcards match whole dotted segments only. A trailing .* covers a
  subtree; an interior * matches exactly one segment. Substring matching here
  would be an access-control bug.

- --include narrows an existing scope and is applied after it, never merged
  into it, so a request can never widen what a role holds.

Verified: 226 tests across core primitives, permissions/redaction, the
resolution pipeline, security, the published conformance fixtures (13 valid,
35 invalid, 8 resolution scenarios), project behaviour, and the five shipped
examples — which are held to --strict and a 100% health score. Benchmarks meet
every published budget (resolve 1,000 objects in ~33ms against a 2s target).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Point install docs at @logicsrc/opencontext; record the npm name collision

The unscoped `opencontext` name is already published on npm by an unrelated
third party (federicodeponte/opencontext, 2.0.0), so `npx opencontext` would
install a stranger's package. Docs now use `npx @logicsrc/opencontext`; the bin
stays named `opencontext` so the command reads as the PRD specifies once
installed.

Recorded in PRD 0003 as a blocker to resolve before any publication, along with
the fact that no @logicsrc spec package has ever been published, so there is no
existing release path to slot into.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Advance the logicsrc-mcp next-PRD-id assertion to 0004

standards.test.ts asserts prd_next_id against the live prd/ directory, so
adding PRD 0003 makes the next free id 0004. The test's own comment
anticipates this: "advances with every PRD added".

Caught by CI, not locally — the earlier verification ran per-package tests for
the packages this branch touches, and logicsrc-mcp is coupled to the PRD
directory without importing from it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 11:46:11 -07:00

261 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown

# Permissions and scopes
**Authorization precedes relevance.** An object a consumer may not read is removed before freshness, ranking, or compilation ever sees it — so it cannot reach a ranker, a prompt, a bundle, or even an explanation.
**Deny overrides allow**, everywhere and unconditionally.
## Scope is opt-in
A role with no `include` list sees nothing. There is no "everything except" mode, because a scope defined by subtraction silently grows every time someone adds context.
```yaml
roles:
support:
include:
- mission
- policies.*
- procedures.*
```
## Patterns
Wildcards always match **whole dotted segments**, never substrings.
| Pattern | Matches | Does not match |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `*` | everything | — |
| `mission` | `mission` | `mission.statement` |
| `products.*` | `products`, `products.enterprise`, `products.enterprise.pricing` | `products-internal` |
| `customers.*.churn-risk` | `customers.acme.churn-risk` | `customers.acme.eu.churn-risk` |
The asymmetry between the last two is deliberate. A **trailing** wildcard is how people express "this subtree". An **interior** wildcard is how they express "this field, whichever record it belongs to". Collapsing them into one rule would make the second silently grant the first.
`products-internal` never matching `products.*` is the property that matters most: substring matching here would be an access-control bug.
## Evaluation order
For each object, in order — the first failure is what gets reported:
1. **Explicit deny.** `permissions.deny` names the consumer or one of its roles → denied.
2. **Scope exclusion.** A role `exclude` pattern matches → denied.
3. **Object read grant.** `permissions.read` exists and does not name the consumer → denied.
4. **Scope inclusion.** No `include` pattern matches → not in scope.
5. **Classification ceiling.** Object classification exceeds the role's → denied.
```yaml
# denied to support, even though policies.* includes it
id: policies.internal.margins
classification: confidential
roles:
support:
include: [policies.*]
exclude: [policies.internal.*]
```
## Classification
```txt
public < internal < confidential < restricted
```
`max_classification` bounds a role. An object above the ceiling is denied even when an include pattern matches it. The default is `internal`, so confidential and restricted context requires an explicit grant.
```yaml
roles:
support:
include: [docs.*]
max_classification: internal # denied docs.litigation
legal:
include: [docs.*]
max_classification: restricted # allowed
```
### Ceilings and inheritance
Two rules, because the two situations mean different things.
**Within an inheritance chain, the most specific declaration wins.** A role that says `max_classification: confidential` means it, even when it inherits a base role capped at `internal`.
```yaml
roles:
everyone:
include: [mission]
max_classification: internal
finance:
inherits: [everyone]
include: [policies.*]
max_classification: confidential # finance really does get confidential
```
The alternative — taking the minimum across the chain — makes a single ceiling on a shared `everyone` role silently cap every role in the repository, so a `finance` role explicitly granted `confidential` quietly receives nothing above `internal`. That is a denial nobody can see in the manifest.
**Across independently requested roles, the lowest wins.** Holding two roles at once must never grant more than either does alone.
```bash
opencontext resolve --role support --role finance # capped at the lower of the two
```
Both are safe under review, because a ceiling is written by whoever edits the manifest — never by the context being read.
## Inheritance
```yaml
roles:
everyone:
include: [mission, glossary]
support:
inherits: [everyone]
include: [policies.*]
exclude: [policies.internal.*]
intern:
inherits: [support]
exclude: [customers.*]
```
Includes, excludes, permissions, and redactions all **union**. An inherited exclusion follows the child, so `intern` cannot see `policies.internal.*` either. Cycles are a validation error.
## Object-level permissions
```yaml
id: policies.payroll
classification: confidential
permissions:
read: [finance]
write: [finance-admin]
deny: [contractor]
```
`read` narrows a role that would otherwise include the object — useful for one sensitive item inside an otherwise open collection. `deny` overrides every grant, including `read: ["*"]`.
Principals are matched against the consumer id **and** its roles, so a grant can name a specific agent or a whole role. `*` and a trailing `.*` are supported.
A name here that is neither a defined role nor a defined agent is reported:
```txt
⚠ invalid-permission: policies.payroll grants access to "finanace", which is neither
a defined role nor a defined agent.
→ Define roles.finanace, or correct the name — a typo here silently denies access.
```
## Reads never imply writes
```yaml
permissions:
read: [support] # support can read
write: [support] # and only this line lets support write
```
An agent that can read context does not thereby gain the ability to change it. See [writes](#writes) below.
## Redaction
Redaction runs **after** authorization: the consumer is entitled to the object and still does not receive every field.
```yaml
roles:
support:
include: [customers.*]
max_classification: confidential
redact:
- path: ssn
mode: remove
reason: PII, never needed to resolve a ticket
- path: payment.card
mode: mask
replacement: "[REDACTED]"
- path: contacts[*].email
mode: hash
```
| Mode | Effect |
| --- | --- |
| `remove` | Deletes the key. Default. |
| `mask` | Replaces the value with `replacement`. |
| `hash` | Replaces it with a sha256 digest, so equality stays testable without disclosure — two records with the same email still match, and neither email is readable. |
### Path syntax
Paths address the object's `content`.
```txt
ssn a top-level field
payment.card nested
contacts[*].email every element of an array
contacts[0].email one element
contacts.email a wildcard-free path applied to an array means every element
customer.ssn a leading segment naming the object's type or id is optional
```
That last rule is what makes a repository-wide rule like `customer.ssn` behave the way an author expects on a `customer` object whose content has `ssn`.
Rules from the manifest, the role, and the object all apply — they union, and the union is applied.
The bundle reports **that** redaction happened, never what was redacted:
```json
{
"id": "customers.acme",
"content": { "name": "ACME Inc.", "payment": { "card": "[REDACTED]" } },
"redacted": ["ssn", "payment.card", "contacts[*].email"]
}
```
Redaction paths address structured content. Prose content has no structure to address, so a structured rule against a Markdown body matches nothing — do not rely on it for PII in free text.
## Permissions as capabilities
```yaml
roles:
support:
permissions: [customer.read, ticket.read, ticket.write]
```
These are transported and scoped by OpenContext, and carried through into the bundle for your runtime to enforce. OpenContext does not itself perform your application's actions.
## Writes
Core resolution is read-only. Mutation is a deliberately narrow exception:
```bash
opencontext add policies.returns --type policy --content "Within 14 days."
opencontext supersede policies.refunds --content "Within 60 days."
```
Three rules:
1. **Writes are never implicit.** `permissions.write` must name the consumer.
2. **Validate before persisting.** Authorization and schema are checked first, so a malformed or unauthorized write never reaches disk.
3. **Promotion is explicit.** Assigning `canonical` or `approved` authority requires `--promote` (CLI) or `allowPromotion: true` (SDK). An agent cannot launder its own observation into policy.
```txt
✗ Refusing to write policies.new with authority "canonical". Promotion to canonical or
approved is an explicit governance act — pass --promote if that is what you mean.
```
Adding an object that already exists is refused: durable context is superseded, never silently overwritten.
## Denied reads look like missing objects
```bash
opencontext get policies.payroll --role support
```
```txt
No context object "policies.payroll" is available to this consumer.
```
A denied read and a nonexistent object are reported identically, so probing for ids reveals nothing about what exists. `list` and `search` apply the same filter before returning any metadata — a search that leaked titles of restricted documents would defeat the scoping model entirely.
## Secrets
Secrets must not live in context. A context repository is usually far more widely readable than the systems it describes.
`validate` fails on committed credentials:
```txt
✗ secret-detected: policies.deploy appears to contain a AWS access key id.
→ Remove it and reference a secret manager instead.
```
Reference an external provider instead, and let your runtime resolve it at use time.