Three things the specs did not say. The reference hub takes 1 percent of
any payment that crosses it, charged to whoever is paying and never
deducted from a seeder or a relay, so a quoted price is what the
publisher gets and a promised floor is what the seeder is paid.
Public swarms are free to fetch and free to list, and an advertisement on
the swarm README page is what pays for that. The ad is on the hub page
and nowhere else: never inside a swarm, never injected into a file, a
segment or a playlist, and never in the catalogue or the market API. A
requester who wants no ad buys a seat instead. A free-to-watch channel
works the same way.
And a requester is a key, not a person. An agent can attest what it made,
price access, sell tickets, take payment through its own payee and spend
what it earns keeping its own work online. The consent rules do not
soften because a machine signed them, and the reference hub asks an
agent public attestation to name a responsible operator key so somebody
is reachable when a notice arrives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SKAohrRkqLKVQL2cGCAkR5
The client encrypts by default and the hub never does: what the hub
manages is who may decrypt. A team is a named set of member keys with a
scope over the owner's swarms; the hub, as keeper, issues grants to
members when the owner is offline, with invitations that expire, roles,
an audit trail, and re-encryption on removal so the next version is
closed to whoever left. A few seats are free; above that the hub charges
per seat and per organisation, settled through the same pay plugins as
everything else. Seeding is priced at disk; access is where a hub earns,
and both sides earn: seeders rent disk, requesters sell access.
Public is not a fallback. Encryption off is an explicit act, and a
public swarm is attested, listed, kept and rendered exactly as a private
one is; the only difference is who can read it.
Every swarm on the market carries a README.md at its root, no
exceptions, and the attestation carries its Markdown and the hash of
the copy inside the swarm, so the hub renders it as the swarm's page
without a key. Relative links resolve into the swarm and are gated the
way the files are.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SKAohrRkqLKVQL2cGCAkR5
The rule is now in the names. pay2* is the client protocol: the side that
pays, over HTTPS, and plays. paid2* is the server protocol: the BitTorrent
side that earns. One hub implements both halves of a pair; a requester or
viewer implements only pay2*; a seeder, relay or gateway only paid2*.
pay2seed keeps consent, offers, the requester's market and notices.
paid2seed takes leases, storage challenges and probes over the wire,
GiB-month accrual and receipts, the seeder client, and the ipfile.pin
mapping.
pay2stream and paid2stream do the same for a live channel over iplive.
A broadcaster attests the channel (with the two rules that separate a
licensed rebroadcast from a stolen feed), buys relays by the hour, and
publishes listings; viewers buy tickets. Relays take leases and are
proven present by a verifier that pulls segments as a peer; a gateway is
a relay that also serves standard HLS, clear or sealed, with the M3U and
XMLTV pair every IPTV app asks for, so VLC, TiviMate, Kodi and a
television play a paid swarm with nothing installed. Ace Stream showed
BitTorrent can carry live TV to millions; this is that with consent,
payment and an open spec.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SKAohrRkqLKVQL2cGCAkR5
