Published as @logicsrc/openprd@0.2.0 — the first release of this package, and
the first carrying OpenPRD 0.3 (Tech Stack and Monetization, #144).
Two things had to change for the publish to be usable:
- The @logicsrc/validators dependency was `file:../validators`. npm publishes
that spec verbatim, so every install outside this monorepo would have
failed to resolve it. It is now `^0.1.0`, which is what is on the registry;
npm workspaces still links the local package for development, since 0.1.0
satisfies the range.
- Added a README. Without one the npm page reads "No README data found",
which is a poor landing surface for the reference implementation of a
public standard. @logicsrc/schemas already ships one.
Verified by installing 0.2.0 from the registry into an empty project: it
resolves @logicsrc/validators@0.1.0 and @logicsrc/schemas@0.1.0, and the
runtime reports OPENPRD_VERSION 0.3 with ten sections, eight for 0.2.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017XRNNm6pK6nPi7rJ6bJNHu
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
OpenPRD 0.2 fixed eight body sections, none of which asked what the thing is
built on or how it earns. The stack got chosen in the first implementation PR
instead of at review, and a PRD could be filled out completely without anyone
writing down who pays. PRD 0006 had already grown a hand-rolled
`## Business model` section, which is the gap showing.
0.3 adds two required sections between `UX Notes` and `Success Metrics`:
- Tech Stack — languages, frameworks, datastores, third-party services, and
anything the work must not depend on. It makes the requirements costable.
- Monetization — the revenue model: who pays, for what, how much, and when.
`_None._` stays a valid answer, but it now has to be said out loud.
Adding required sections would normally invalidate every document already
written, so a document is now held to the section list its own `openprd:` key
fixes. A 0.2 document keeps conforming with eight sections, forever; a 0.3
document needs ten. Adoption is per document, and `logicsrc prd validate
--expect-version 0.3` (new flag, wiring up the validator option that already
existed) reports the stragglers as OP-L-VERSION.
The front-matter schema is untouched — both additions are body sections.
Conformance bundle proves both directions: invalid/missing-monetization.md
fails with OP-C-SECTION-MISSING, and valid/legacy-0-2.md passes unedited.
This repo's own PRDs 0001-0006 stay at 0.2 as standing evidence that the
compatibility rule holds. PRD 0007 records the decision at 0.3.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017XRNNm6pK6nPi7rJ6bJNHu
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
OpenPRD has existed as a document (docs/openprd.md), a front-matter schema, a
template, and this repo's prd/ collection. Nothing enforced it. This adds the
reference implementation.
@logicsrc/openprd
- parser: front-matter + the eight `##` sections + numbered requirements.
`###` stays content so a long Requirements section can be organized, and
headings or R#-shaped lines inside code fences are ignored
- validation splits the standard's four conformance rules (filename,
front-matter schema, id-matches-prefix, eight sections in order) from
lint (empty section, missing priority tag, numbering gaps, duplicate R#,
date order, one-sided supersession, stale index). Conformance failures are
errors; --strict promotes the rest. Stable codes, file, line, hint
- collection rules the per-file view cannot see: unique ids, monotonic
numbering with no gaps, 0000 reserved for the template, cross-references
that resolve
- lifecycle enforced rather than advisory: Draft cannot jump to Final,
terminal statuses do not resume, Superseded must name its replacement
- deterministic index generation, so `prd index` is idempotent and CI can
diff it
- front-matter rewriting that leaves the body byte-identical
- the optional LogicSRC task bridge the standard describes: each R# becomes
one logicsrc.task, validated against logicsrc-task.schema.json before it
is emitted; creator DID derived from the author email
CLI: logicsrc prd init|new|list|show|validate|lint|index|status|next|tasks|
export. Exit codes stable for CI (0 ok, 1 invalid, 2 usage, 3 not found).
Conformance bundle: packages/schemas/fixtures/openprd/ — 6 documents that must
validate and 12 that must fail, each naming the error code it must produce.
Several rules depend on the filename, so every fixture records the name it is
validated as.
Docs: an Implementation section in docs/openprd.md (CLI, validation model,
task bridge, conformance bundle), the spec added to the site's docs surface,
nav and sitemap entries, and a README section.
Verification: 76 new tests; full monorepo build and all 451 workspace tests
pass. The suite dogfoods this repo — prd/ validates with zero errors and zero
warnings, the embedded template is byte-identical to docs/openprd/0000-
template.md, and all 210 requirements in PRD 0001 map to schema-valid tasks.
prd/README.md is regenerated by the tool it now ships.
Refs: docs/openprd.md
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
