mirror of
https://github.com/profullstack/logicsrc.git
synced 2026-08-13 22:37:29 +00:00
Point install docs at @logicsrc/opencontext; record the npm name collision
The unscoped `opencontext` name is already published on npm by an unrelated third party (federicodeponte/opencontext, 2.0.0), so `npx opencontext` would install a stranger's package. Docs now use `npx @logicsrc/opencontext`; the bin stays named `opencontext` so the command reads as the PRD specifies once installed. Recorded in PRD 0003 as a blocker to resolve before any publication, along with the fact that no @logicsrc spec package has ever been published, so there is no existing release path to slot into. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec3ed64f20
commit
dc56e4c741
7 changed files with 31 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -183,6 +183,20 @@ that quietly diverged would become a second contract.
|
|||
- **Digest churn.** A resolver bug fix that changes what is selected changes
|
||||
bundle digests, which a consumer might read as tampering. Mitigated by calling
|
||||
such fixes out explicitly in the changelog.
|
||||
- **Blocker: the `opencontext` npm name is taken.** This PRD proposes
|
||||
`opencontext` as the package name and `npx opencontext` as the install path.
|
||||
That name is already published by an unrelated third party
|
||||
(`federicodeponte/opencontext`, currently 2.0.0, "AI-powered company context
|
||||
analysis from your terminal") — and being adjacent in subject matter makes the
|
||||
confusion worse, not better. Documentation therefore ships pointing at
|
||||
`npx @logicsrc/opencontext`, and the `bin` is still named `opencontext` so the
|
||||
command reads as specified once installed. Resolving this needs a decision
|
||||
before any publication: request a transfer, pick a different unscoped name, or
|
||||
commit to the scoped package permanently.
|
||||
- **No publication pipeline exists yet.** Neither `@logicsrc/openprd` nor
|
||||
`@logicsrc/openontology` has ever been published to npm, so OpenContext is not
|
||||
slotting into an established release path — one has to be built. Until then
|
||||
the only distribution is this repository.
|
||||
- **Open question.** Should interior wildcards (`customers.*.churn-risk`) remain
|
||||
single-segment only, or should a future minor version add a bounded multi-
|
||||
segment form? Single-segment is shipped in v1 because the alternative silently
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue